Will you be happy with Obama's socialized health care or will skiing be a bad idea in the US too? - air evac services inc
In relation to the case of the actress fell into a ski resort in Mont Tremblant, Quebec, the AP reports:
As a steady stream of celebrities to pay their last respects to Natasha Richardson, the question arises as to whether a medical helicopter would be able to rescue the actress in the crisis.
The province of Quebec, has no health care system with the helicopter, often associated in the United States and other parts of Canada, the patient to a major trauma center services. Top hotel trauma medical director, said Friday he may have played a role in the death of Richardson.
"It is impossible for me to comment specifically on his case, but what I can say is ... trip to Mont Tremblant in the city (Montreal) 1/2-hour trip is 2 and the trauma center is closer to the city. Our system is not configured to injury and does not correspond to what in other cities in Canada are available, and even less in the States, "said Tarek Razek, director of trauma services at McGill University Health Center, Montreal, SIX represents hospitals.
Juwhere a word. Socialized medicine, the euphemism of the general health care are well known greedy government employees.
Natasha Richardson received similar treatment in Quebec have received, and is now at the age of 45 years died because Quebec does not have something as simple as a health care system by helicopter.
Many proponents argue that socialization is dead because she had refused medical care. SO WHAT? Many people do not know with traumatic brain injuries in the United States and come to live. If they the accident in the U.S. ... alive today because we have first-class air service agreements and EVAC America could throw a dart and hit a scanner or a doctor to drill a circular hole and extract the epidural hematoma.
1 comment:
It seems a little harsh that people die to have to prove incompetence, the idea of government corruption in medicine for people who are growing fanaticism of this system to others. But you have it, then I'm sorry to say. For example, was the opposite would be hypocritical first Tedward Kennedy died long ago, the United Kingdom. You see, 77 years old, not even on the list for an MRI scan list.
Age is a factor of rationing in Jolly Olde England.
This happens in a socialist health care, such as the United Kingdom (also known as universal health care), through laughter, they call "tax expenditure".
If you (pay for their own health care or your employer pays deferred income) that you expect and demand a level of service.
You can complain about the cost, but cost is. Are the costs. And you get what you pay for. System of Britain is crap, in part because she was the half of what Americans spend on giving. What? Do you think that the UK will receive the same service as the Americans, but half the cost? You really can not be reproduced without error.
Ask Obama. It is a hypocritical, lying bastard.
How and why? Think about it. The word "tax.
You remember how the Marxist-in-chief has been elected? Yes, by lying about almost everything he thought. But he was intelligent (albeit a little low) and he knew he was lying about when he lied, tax cuts for 95% of Americans.
Get the Socialists and the rest of you Nazi scum? The people pay no taxes. This is an issue every election.
So, how would that work on a system that taxes to fund health? The political elections to be there to defend and increase the tax to non-payment for sick health of the government.
It would be a campaign to bring irresistible and endlessly, those costs by rationing health. Depending on age, lifestyle, what they can escape.
Welcome to Obamacare. You'll love it.
Post a Comment